Notifications
Clear all

Use of Unify fx vs VST Fx


Pottz
(@pottz)
Eminent Member
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 37
Topic starter  

I'm just dipping my toes into the Unified libraries and had a look at the Diva Unified library.  Just for my understanding, what is the logic in having Unify Reverb and Delay fx in the patch when there is already access to those FX through Diva?  I'm just keen to understand the approach so I can work out whether these Unified libraries are something useful for my workflow.


Quote
getdunne
(@getdunne)
Member Admin
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 2957
 
Posted by: @pottz

what is the logic in having Unify Reverb and Delay fx in the patch when there is already access to those FX through Diva?

In a sense it's redundant, but using Unify's resources provides:

  • Slightly easier parameter linking
  • More flexible routing
  • Option to use different delay/reverb algorithms than what the third-party plug-in (in this case Diva) provides
  • Greater tutorial value, to illustrate patch design for Unify, independent of the third-party plug-in.

ReplyQuote
PlugInGuruForums
(@pluginguruforums)
Owner/Guru Admin
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 235
 

It's also very effective once you add more than 1 layer of instruments. You now have global effects ready to be used. 

 

Since they are very CPU efficient, having AUX bus effects are great once things get more complex.

Life is Sound / Sound is Divine
www.pluginguru.com


ReplyQuote
Pottz
(@pottz)
Eminent Member
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 37
Topic starter  

Thanks guys - makes sense.  I'm at the early stage on these unified libraries, but beginning to see how they can be really useful.  More so when I'm in production mode rather than Live performance mode (which has been my focus to date and where Unify has been incredible....unifying;=)


ReplyQuote
Share: