Notifications
Clear all

Updates on Multi-outs Audio In?

9 Posts
5 Users
2 Likes
186 Views
Kendall W Cochran III
(@pbeprod)
Re-Membered
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 298
Topic starter  

@getdunne

Any updates on the progress of Multi-Audio Outs?

Were there any thoughts on Audio Ins?


   
nonchai reacted
Quote
(@getdunne)
Illustrious Member Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3960
 

@pbeprod

Much thought, little progress. Updating Unify to support Apple's new ARM processors took up most of 2022 for me. Selling my home and moving (three times -- long story) killed the rest.


   
ReplyQuote
Kendall W Cochran III
(@pbeprod)
Re-Membered
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 298
Topic starter  

@getdunne

Understandable, was curious!

Have a Great and productive New Year!

This post was modified 3 months ago by Kendall W Cochran III

   
getdunne reacted
ReplyQuote
(@nonchai)
Active Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 12
 

@getdunne sorry to hear that 

hope things have settled for now 

Glad it’s on your mind 

For me it’s really the addition of multi outs that will give me a reason to begin using my Unify. I can see so many powerful use cases for me  once it happens 


   
ReplyQuote
(@getdunne)
Illustrious Member Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3960
 

Posted by: @nonchai

For me it’s really the addition of multi outs that will give me a reason to begin using my Unify.

Is it entirely useless to you without multiple outputs?

 


   
ReplyQuote
(@uisbf)
New Member
Joined: 2 months ago
Posts: 4
 

multiple outs would be nice .. I wondered if I can adjust the buffer size which is usually 16 at my pc and works for most cases and the sample rate somewhere .. it seems I have quite some latency with unify right now. But still great ideas .. like it


   
ReplyQuote
(@getdunne)
Illustrious Member Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3960
 

Posted by: @uisbf

I wondered if I can adjust the buffer size which is usually 16 at my pc

Unify will not work efficiently with such a small buffer size. I recommend 256.

 


   
ReplyQuote
(@woodslanding)
Eminent Member
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 13
 

I'm anxious for audio ins.  I haven't had a desire for multiple outs.  If you're running in a daw, can't you just run different instances of Unify?  I guess not if you are running surround samples in surround.  Do they make surround samples?

But I'd love to get my FX vsts 'unified'.  Since I patch them dynamically in Hollyhock, I don't want them as part of my Unify presets.  And I also have external audio inputs that I route to my FX....

In regards the off-topic above, I run two instances of Unify in my live performance setup, along with 5 instances of kontakt, 4 instances of Reaktor and 4 vst effects channels comfortably under Hollyhock 5 at 64 samples latency on my Ryzen 5900 with no dropouts.  If you have a fast processor, it's not a problem.  Unify does not seem inefficient, I don't see measurable increases in processor over running the vsts by themselves.  16 samples is ambitious, but 64 has been very playable for me.  I was extremely happy to move down from 128 when I bought the Ryzen.  128 always felt sluggish, and it was hard to play fast tempos.  I haven't been at 256 since 2010.


   
ReplyQuote
(@getdunne)
Illustrious Member Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3960
 

Posted by: @woodslanding

I'm anxious for audio ins.... I'd love to get my FX vsts 'unified'.

For the moment, have a look at Kushview Element. It's free and the plug-in version allows for what you are trying to do.

 


   
ReplyQuote
Share: